Failure Analysis
Analyse • Recognise • Solve • Prevent
Detect and prevent damage
Small components with a great effect – seals and other elastomer components are of great importance in technical applications. They are cheap to buy and challenging in their function. As long as they work, few think about the small, elastic components. However, if they fail, the consequences are usually not just inconvenient.
It is rather common for the entire machine or vehicle to come to a standstill, sometimes even resulting in a total breakdown. In such cases, it is not enough to simply replace the component and wait for the next failure. It is important to track down the causes of the failure, to recognise errors and learn from them in order to avoid future failures.
Our Core Competence
Damage analysis of elastomer seals and technical moulded parts, for example diaphragms, elastomer or TPE hoses, is one of the core competences of the Elastomer Institut Richter.
Since 1996 we have been supporting our customers in the event of damage with our specialist knowledge and extensive experience. We assess and analyse faulty components, identify the cause of the damage and propose measures to eliminate the causes and prevent further damage.
In well over 2000 cases, the expertise of the Elastomer Institut Richter has helped to identify and permanently solve problems. Regardless of where the cause lay – in the manufacturing process, the installation space, the quality of the formulation or the stress. In addition, our qualified and objective analyses contribute to an amicable settlement in cases of complaints and damage.
Often, only small changes and improvements in the manufacturing process or the application can save immense costs and repair the loss of image and reputation associated with the incident of damage. Moreover, we always pay attention to a pragmatic and practical approach so that you get the answers promptly and with manageable effort.
The first impression
Damage to a technical moulded part is usually only noticed when it no longer fulfils its function. Seals or hoses are suddenly leaking; leakage becomes obvious because liquid, oil or gas escapes from the device in conspicuous quantities. Dampers insufficiently absorb vibrations or shocks and diaphragms lose their switching or separating function.
Often, the observer can visually recognise a change or damage to the component at first sight. Where the component was smooth, elastic, black or coloured before installation, discoloured, cracked, brittle or smudgy components appear after a failure.
However, visual appearance alone does not usually provide a clue to the course of the damage. In addition to the component and material itself, the installation space and the application and environmental conditions should also be considered. Only in combination is it possible to find out reliably what really happened to the component.
What can be seen
This is how we proceed
We only examine what is actually necessary and carry out all analyses following the motto “as much as necessary, as little as possible“. This saves time and significantly reduces the effort of an entire examination.
Thanks to our wealth of experience from numerous failure analyses, we are able to quickly overview the required inspection effort and effectively develop solutions. In some cases, you will receive initial reliable findings about the damage after just a few days. Of course, we will then explain the results of the analysis to you and recommend remedial measures to prevent future damage.
Our primary goal in a failure analysis is to identify the root cause in order to suggest suitable remedial measures.
In every case of damage, the first step is a microscopic examination of the defective seal, an examination of the installation space and the application conditions that led to the failure. Not until then the rather more cost-intensive use of complex analytics makes sense in order to confirm the assumed damage hypothesis and possibly exclude other causes.
We proceed systematically in five steps:
1. Identification of the sample or the defective component
Does the material of the damage sample really correspond to the specifications or supplier requirements? Pictures and user information alone are not sufficient for a reliable analysis. An identity check provides clarity.
Unfortunately, it happens repeatedly that simply the wrong material was used. In about 1-2% of cases of damage, this is already the solution to the problem.
2. Gather information on the application
In the next step, we ask for details about the application, the functional principle of the component, the damage and its history. The better we know the application and operating conditions of the component and the circumstances under which the damage occurred, the more accurately we can assess the cause of the damage.
3. Analysis of the damage pattern with evaluation
This third step is the most important of the entire failure analysis. It is about identifying and correctly assessing the damage and the traces of strain on the failed component, for example a gasket.
This includes a microscopic examination of the damaged component:
We examine the condition of the surfaces, the type and extent of the damage and the dimensions of the component. We have various digital microscopes and a scanning electron microscope at our disposal for this purpose.
Further material analyses are used if necessary: In some cases of damage, additional material analyses are necessary to trace the damage mechanism. With the help of state-of-the-art testing methods and equipment, we are able to clearly analyse and narrow down a large number of cases of damage and identify the causes.
4. Validation of the Assumptions
Once a possible explanation for the cause of the damage has been found in steps one to three, it is important to secure this assumption as far as possible. This includes checking and questioning the peripheral and operational conditions. In unclear situations or in the case of several possible causes for a damage pattern, the use of further material analysis often helps to secure conclusions.
5. Report with recommendation of possible corrective actions
At the end of the failure analysis, a report is prepared. In it, the assumed cause of the damage is named and explained conclusively. The aim is to show the complete logic of the failure even to non-specialists and uninvolved parties and to clearly present and evaluate the objective results of all investigations.
Once the real cause of the damage has been identified with a high certainty, the report specifies suitable remedial measures to eliminate the failure and prevent future damage.
If, even after intensive investigation of all factors, uncertainties remain in the assessment of the damage pattern and thus in the naming of the main cause, it is important to also present this frankly and clearly to the client.
In the report “Integral approach to failure analysis – the best way to the real cause of failure”.
Bernhard Richter describes in detail the five steps of a successful damage analysis
and uses examples to show how they are implemented in practice.
Classification of damage mechanisms
As in most cases, a certain damage mechanism can be identified in the examined damage patterns. In practice, a subdivision of the occurring damage mechanisms, i.e. the main causes of the occurring damages, into four groups has proven successful:
1. Media
Damage caused by media includes chemical attack, that is chemical alteration of the material structure, as well as excessive swelling due to the absorption of media in the material. Extraction of material components, that is, inappropriate shrinkage of the components, is also possible due to the influence of media.
In an application, users should count all chemicals, liquids or gaseous substances the component comes into contact with as media.
2. Temperature and Ageing
If elastomers are thermally overloaded, which means they are heated far and permanently above their permissible service temperature, damage often occurs. Cracked and brittle surfaces or permanent deformation are the result. Similar damage patterns can sometimes also occur within the typical polymer temperature limits due to extended operating times. This group of causes also includes all related mechanisms, thus various forms of ageing, which ultimately lead to premature failure via an impairment of the network structure of the material.
3. Mechanical or physical impact
This group includes all mechanisms that damage the component without changing the network structure of the material. This includes typical causes that can be attributed to the installation space, for example sharp edges or incorrect groove dimensions and damage that can be attributed to improper assembly of the components. In addition, physical causes such as abrasion or explosive decompression fall into this group.
4. Manufacturing Defects
These include defects that are directly attributable to the manufacturing process and also clearly represent an impermissible deviation from the target state. Examples are cracks due to improper demoulding, flow lines, defects and other manufacturing defects.
For a more profound introduction to this topic, we offer our seminar “Failure analysis of elastomer seals”. Even if your focus is not on seals, you will find valuable information on the systematic analysis of a damage pattern and learn how to identify the logic of a failure.
In addition you can find out more about possible damage to elastomer components and the possible causes in our detailed reports:
Downloads